View  Edit  Attributes  History  Attach  Print  Search
Site / ShortPaper

Site.ShortPaper History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

Added lines 34-35:

Assignments over the word/page limit will receive a penalty of 10% or only be graded up to the word/page limit, at the discretion of the instructor.
September 27, 2017, at 04:50 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed lines 19-20 from:
* What was the worldview? (1%)
* What was the research design/approach
? (1%)
to:
* What was the worldview and strategy of inquiry? (1%)
Added line 21:
* What were the methods used to collect data? (1%)
Changed lines 24-27 from:
* What, if any, ethical concerns existed with the work? (1%)
* Why do you think the authors chose this approach? (2%)
* Do
the strengths of the knowledge claims fit with the approach? Explain why you believe so. (2%)
* Can you think of another approach?
(2%)
to:
* What, if any, ethical concerns existed with the work? (1%)  (Note: you aren't necessarily looking for ethical problems with the published work.  You are looking for ethical concerns that the researchers would have need to address.)
* Why do you think the authors chose their approaches, including worldviews, methodology, methods? (2%)
* Do the types of the knowledge claims fit with the approach? Explain why you believe so. (2%)
* Can you think of other approaches to conduct the research?  Why might they be valid
? (2%)
September 20, 2017, at 09:34 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Added line 26:
* Do the strengths of the knowledge claims fit with the approach? Explain why you believe so. (2%)
Deleted line 27:
* Do the strengths of the knowledge claims fit with the approach? Explain why you believe so. (2%)
September 20, 2017, at 09:33 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed lines 19-27 from:
* What was the worldview?
* What was the research design/approach?
* What was the methodology?
* What work did theory do?
* Why do you think the authors chose this approach?
* Can you think of another approach?
* How was validity assessed?
* How do the strengths of knowledge claims fit with the
approach?
* What, if any, ethical concerns existed with the work?
to:
* What was the worldview? (1%)
* What was the research design/approach? (1%)
* What was the methodology? (1%)
* What work did theory do? (1%)
* How was validity assessed? (1%)
* What, if any, ethical concerns existed with the work? (1%)
* Why do you think the authors chose this approach? (2%)
* Can you think of another
approach? (2%)
* Do the strengths of the knowledge claims fit with the approach? Explain why you believe so. (2%)

We will grade you on each of the above plus an additional 3% for one's ability to write clearly and effectively.
September 20, 2017, at 09:29 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed lines 16-17 from:
Read the paper, discuss it with your peers during class activities, and then write a '''two page report maximum''' (single spaced) that reflects on and analyzes the paper.
to:
Read the paper, discuss it with your peers during class activities, and then write a report of '''maximum 1600 words''' that reflects on and analyzes the paper.  You should format your paper according to the publication format usually used in the journals or conferences that you and your supervisor would typically submit to.  You must also use the citation/reference style used as a part of these submissions.  For example, I usually submit to the ACM CHI Conference, so I would the [[https://chi2018.acm.org/chi-proceedings-format/ | ACM CHI Proceedings format and citation style found here]].
Changed line 31 from:
Bring a paper copy to class of your report and email the document to your instructor (send a PDF and the source files).
to:
Bring a paper copy to class of your report.
July 17, 2017, at 12:57 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 8 from:
* Kruijff, E., Marquardt, A., Trepkowski, C., Lindemann, R., Hinkenjann, A., Maiero, J., & Riecke, B. E. (2016). On Your Feet! Enhancing Self-Motion Perception in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli (pp. 149–158). Presented at the ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI ’16), Tokyo, Japan: ACM. doi:10.1145/2983310.2985759  [[Attach:Kruijff_SUI2016.pdf | (.pdf)]]
to:
* Kruijff, E., Marquardt, A., Trepkowski, C., Lindemann, R., Hinkenjann, A., Maiero, J., & Riecke, B. E. (2016). On Your Feet! Enhancing Self-Motion Perception in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli (pp. 149–158). Presented at the ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI ’16), Tokyo, Japan: ACM. doi:10.1145/2983310.2985759  [[http://home.inf.h-brs.de/~ekruij2m/Kruijff_SUI2016.pdf | (.pdf)]]
July 17, 2017, at 12:56 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 8 from:
* Paper: TBD
to:
* Kruijff, E., Marquardt, A., Trepkowski, C., Lindemann, R., Hinkenjann, A., Maiero, J., & Riecke, B. E. (2016). On Your Feet! Enhancing Self-Motion Perception in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli (pp. 149–158). Presented at the ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI ’16), Tokyo, Japan: ACM. doi:10.1145/2983310.2985759  [[Attach:Kruijff_SUI2016.pdf | (.pdf)]]
July 14, 2017, at 02:01 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Added lines 28-29:

'''Submission:'''
July 12, 2017, at 04:58 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 13 from:
3. '''Creation''' - art/design-based approaches
to:
3. '''Creation''' - design or art based approaches
July 12, 2017, at 04:58 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed lines 11-12 from:
* [[http://clab.iat.sfu.ca/pubs/Pan-EscapeRooms-DIS2017.pdf | PDF of Paper]]: Rui Pan, Henry Lo, and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. Collaboration, Awareness, and Communication in Real-Life Escape Rooms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1353-1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064767
to:
* Rui Pan, Henry Lo, and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. Collaboration, Awareness, and Communication in Real-Life Escape Rooms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1353-1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064767
Changed line 14 from:
* Paper: TBD
to:
* Audrey Desjardins and Ron Wakkary. 2016. Living In A Prototype: A Reconfigured Space. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5274-5285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858261
July 12, 2017, at 04:56 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 11 from:
* Paper: TBD
to:
* [[http://clab.iat.sfu.ca/pubs/Pan-EscapeRooms-DIS2017.pdf | PDF of Paper]]: Rui Pan, Henry Lo, and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. Collaboration, Awareness, and Communication in Real-Life Escape Rooms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1353-1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064767
July 12, 2017, at 04:46 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 1 from:
'''Short Paper and In-Class Group Discussion (15%)'''
to:
'''Assignment 2: Short Paper and In-Class Group Discussion (15%)'''
June 16, 2017, at 09:10 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 16 from:
Read the paper, discuss with your peers during class activities, and then write a '''two page report maximum''' (single spaced) that reflects on and analyzes the paper.
to:
Read the paper, discuss it with your peers during class activities, and then write a '''two page report maximum''' (single spaced) that reflects on and analyzes the paper.
June 16, 2017, at 09:10 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 18 from:
Your report should answer these questions:
to:
'''Your report should answer these questions:'''
June 16, 2017, at 09:09 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Added line 29:
Bring a paper copy to class of your report and email the document to your instructor (send a PDF and the source files).
June 16, 2017, at 09:09 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed lines 13-14 from:
# '''Creation''' - art/design-based approaches
3. Paper: TBD
to:
3. '''Creation''' - art/design-based approaches
* Paper: TBD
June 16, 2017, at 09:09 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed line 7 from:
# '''Effective''' - experimental
to:
1. '''Effective''' - experimental
Changed line 10 from:
# '''Experience''' - observational
to:
2. '''Experience''' - observational
Changed line 14 from:
* Paper: TBD
to:
3. Paper: TBD
June 16, 2017, at 09:08 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Changed lines 1-28 from:
'''Short Paper and In-Class Group Discussion'''
to:
'''Short Paper and In-Class Group Discussion (15%)'''

The goal of this short paper assignment is to practice identifying and analyzing methodological approaches, research designs, and data collection and analysis methods for an existing piece of research.

Choose a paper from one of the three lenses of research:

# '''Effective''' - experimental
* Paper: TBD

# '''Experience''' - observational
* Paper: TBD

# '''Creation''' - art/design-based approaches
* Paper: TBD

Read the paper, discuss with your peers during class activities, and then write a '''two page report maximum''' (single spaced) that reflects on and analyzes the paper.

Your report should answer these questions:
* What was the worldview?
* What was the research design/approach?
* What was the methodology?
* What work did theory do?
* Why do you think the authors chose this approach?
* Can you think of another approach?
* How was validity assessed?
* How do the strengths of knowledge claims fit with the approach?
* What, if any, ethical concerns existed with the work?

June 16, 2017, at 03:52 PM by 173.180.252.200 -
Added line 1:
'''Short Paper and In-Class Group Discussion'''